|
1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, United States of America, 1994.
2. Austrian Research Association for Transportation and Road Engineering RVS 3.23, The New Austrian Guidelines for the Alignment of Roads, Alignment, Principles and Explanations, Vienna, 1981, Vol. 76.
3. Guidelines for the Design of Rural Roads (RAL) Part II: Alignment (RAL-L-1), German Road and Transportation Research Association, Germany, 1973.
4. Guidelines for the Design of Roads (RAS), Part: Alignment (RAS-L), Section 1: Parameters of the Alignment (RAS-L-1), German Road and Transportation Research Association, Germany, 1984.
5. Γιώτης Απ., Ψαριανός Β., Κανονισμοί Μελέτης οδών κατά RAS, RAS-L-1/1984, Αθήνα 1991
6. Swiss Association of Road Specialists (VSS), Swiss Norms SNV 640123 Alignment, Superelevation Rates in Tangents and Curves, 1969, and 640100 Elements of Horizontal Alignment, 1973.
7. Technical Recommendations for the General Design and Geometry of Roads, Highway Design Guide (except for motorways), Technical Guide August 1994 (Translation August 1995), document produced and distributed by: SETRA le Service d' Etudes techniques des Routes et Autoroutes, Centre de la Securite et des Techniques Routieres, France, 1995.
8. Durth W. and Lippold C., Adjustment of the German Design Guidelines for the Alignment (RAS- L-1, 1984) to Newer Design Guidelines, Research Contract FE-No. 6.2.2/91 of the Federal Minister of Transportation, Technical University of Darmstadt, Department: Road Design and Road Operation, Darmstadt, Germany, 1993.
9. Durth W. and Beys - Kamnarokos G., Comparison of the Guidelines for Road Design in the Countries of the European Community, Research Contract Project Road Safety Year-Grant No. VII-B-336 of the Commission of the European Community, University of Darmstadt, Department: Road Design and Road Operation, Darmstadt, Germany, 1987.
10. Lamm R., Hayward J.C. and Cargin G., Comparison of Different Procedures for Evaluating Speed Consistency, Transportation Research Record, U.S.A., 1986, Vol. 1100, pp. 10-20.
11. Lamm R. and Smith B.L., Curvilinear Alignment: An Important Issue for a More Consistent and Safer Road Characteristic, Transportation Research Record, U.S.A., 1994, pp. 12-21.
12. Lamm R., Psarianos B., Guenther A.K., and Soilemezoglou G. Interrelationships between Three Safety Criteria, Modern Highway Geometric Design, as well as High Risk Target Locations and Groups, The Third International Conference on Safety and the Environment in 21ST Century, Lessons from the Past, Shaping the Future, Tel- Aviv, Israel, Proceedings Book, pp. 439-458, 1994.
13. Lamm R., Psarianos B., Choueiri E.M. and Mailaender T., The Tangent as a Dynamic Design Element, Road and Construction (Strassen- und Tiefbau), Germany, 1995, Vol. 7/8 and 9, pp. 16-21, and 14-19.
14. Ψαριανός Β., Προσδιορισμός Λειτουργικών Ταχυτήτων, Τμήμα Αγρονόμων και Τοπογράφων Μηχανικών, ΕΜΠ, 1994.
15. Ψαριανός Β., Προσδιορισμός ενός Συστήματος Τιμών ως Κριτήριο Αξιολόγησης της Δυναμικής Κινήσεως Οχημάτων στην Ελλάδα, Τμήμα Αγρονόμων και Τοπογράφων Μηχανικών, ΕΜΠ, 1995.
16. Lamm R., Psarianos B., Soilemezoglou G. and Kanellaidis G., Driving Dynamic Aspects and Related Safety Issues for Modern Geometric Design of Non-Built-Up Roads, Transportation Research Record, USA, 1996, No 1523, pp. 34-45.
17. Advice Note TA43/84 (paragraph 2.3.4 Departures from standards), Department of Transport Highways and Traffic, UK.
18. Lamm R., et al., Highway Design and Traffic Safety Engineering Handbook, McGraw-Hill 1999.
19. Durth W., et al, Darmstadt University of Technology, Revised Design for Stopping Sight Distance, Second International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, June 2000, Mainz, Germany.
20. Fabro D. et al, Texas A & M University, A New Stopping Sight Distance Model for use in Highway Geometric Design, August, 1995, Boston, USA.